The influence of facetious leaders in South Sudan

Daniel Abushery Daniel. Photo: File

By: Daniel Abushery Daniel, USA

December 1, 2018 (SSNA) — It’s like that old saying, “Everybody’s talking about the weather, but nobody ever does anything about it:” Public consultation is essential and healthy where there are a verity of communities with different ideologies and prejudice among its members, especially in a newly born nation like South Sudan, not to mention the nation – State relationship, which is mostly vague, because they can’t seem to agree on specific system of governance, but make no mistake about it. It shouldn’t be surprising that different view of confederation system in my humble opinion should be the answer. Why?

Fellow countrymen, the simple legal definition of confederate system is; ” a type of government where a treaty signed between states. However, they are allowed to preserve some independent powers over internal and external affairs. Such governments tend to have a common constitution, common currency, common defense and common foreign affairs.”

Furthermore, South Sudan is multi-cultural, traditional and religious, “a melting pot”. You can also call it a homogenous country, if you wish, due to all these various tribes dwelling in. But, despite all of the above, the influence of facetious leaders may kindle a flame within their particular ethnic groups.

However, with federalism, it will enable them to spread a general conflagration through other states. Because in a large federalist system, there are always many checks and balance on a majority faction – more interests competing with each other and large distances to separate those who might scheme to deprive others of liberty. Because the causes of faction could not be removed without placing too many
restrictions on freedom, its effects had to be controlled by a properly constructed government, if a faction were less than a majority, it could be controlled through majority rule. Nonetheless, if the faction were a majority, it can lead to limit the ability of a majority to carry out its wishes or Interests, and that was through well-articulated and let me repeat; a well written constructed constitution of the land.

What’s the word interest means?

It’s may vary, but the common definition divided into two types; private interest groups that seek economic benefits for their members or clients. For example; business, labor, and agriculture etc..
The second is; public interest groups, which always lobby for political and social causes, if they succeed, benefits are shared more widely than by just the members of the group.

More illustration, for example here in the United States of America, the Taxpayers Union Lobbies for reduced taxes not only for its members alone, but for everyone who pays taxes.

Another example is; Amnesty International lobbies for the rights of political prisoners around the world even though none of its members are prisoners.

Nevertheless, public interest doesn’t mean that a majority are necessarily favour the goals of its groups. The points I am trying to stress here is: Yes, we have many tribes and different communities in South Sudan, but we cannot achieve our interests through those communities, but through social, economic, and political parties, if we really mean to succeed and share the benefits. It will be faulty perception for a single group to achieve their own interests excluding other groups in the country.

Therefore, we urge all conflicted parties, all forces and all citizens to stop escalating violence and embrace a culture of peace and to reject hostility, and return away from division, incitement, hate- speeches, rumors and pointing figures to others, and learn to resolve any dispute through dialogue in a spirit of unity, and tranquility. Always remember, we are all brothers and sisters regardless of geographical boundaries, ethnicity, religion, culture, or political affiliation, with the insisting on mutual respect for diversity through federal and confederation system, which is only viable alternative to the conflicts. Compatriots; for the sacrificial of our nation that; we and our forefathers squandered more than five decades in the bushes and exiles, struggling and fighting for its independence, it’s wasn’t worth the fighting for, just to achieve a private interest of a certain facetious group. Let’s all embrace peaceful coherence and averted the hell of war.

The author of this piece is a concern citizen. Now is writing a memoir book titled: ” If I were the President.” He can be reached at email: [email protected].

Previous Post
Will Khartoum peace agreement bring reform or maintain tyranny?
Next Post
Oil production and Environmental pollution: A serious concern that need to be address with urgency

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.